<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Orlando Personal Injury Law BLOG &#187; Defective products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/category/defective-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com</link>
	<description>Protecting Injured Clients in Orlando</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do I Have a Case Against Walt Disney World?</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/01/do-i-have-a-case-against-walt-disney-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/01/do-i-have-a-case-against-walt-disney-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food-borne Illnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theme park accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tourist Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food poisoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando personal injury attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourist injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walt disney world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Q:</strong> My 15-month-old daughter and husband became violently ill after sharing a children’s meal at a restaurant on Walt Disney World’s property in Orlando. My daughter was hospitalized for nausea, vomiting and dehydration. The doctor suspected <a title="Link to more information on food poisoning. " href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/food-borne-illnesses-and-food-poisoning/">food poisoning</a>. It took my daughter a month to fully purge her infant system of the toxins and to return to her normal activity and developmental levels. I would like to know if I have a case against Disney. Are they liable for anything—medical bills, car rental, hotel bills or lost wages for me and my husband? Also, would she be eligible for any type of settlement, and if so, historically what might a fair settlement consist of? We live in New York, should we be looking for an attorney in New York or Orlando?<br />
-(Question submitted to Jonathan Gregg Stein, contributor at Avvo.com)</p>
<p><strong><em>A:</em></strong><em> Please keep in mind that I can only respond based on the information in your question, and my answer is not legal advice. With that being said, it sounds like you do have a case. The restaurant at <a title="Link to more information on Walt Disney World." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/disneys-mgm-studios/">Walt Disney World</a> is responsible for your medical bills as well as any general damages, including pain and suffering. You should look to retain an attorney in Orlando, particularly one who specializes in <a title="Link to more information on tourist injuries." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/tourist-injuries/">tourist injuries.</a> </em></p>
<p><strong>Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand, P.A.—<a title="Link to contact an Orlando personal injury attorney." href="http://www.whkpa.com/contact/">Orlando personal injury attorneys</a>. </strong></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Q:</strong> My 15-month-old daughter and husband became violently ill after sharing a children’s meal at a restaurant on Walt Disney World’s property in Orlando. My daughter was hospitalized for nausea, vomiting and dehydration. The doctor suspected <a title="Link to more information on food poisoning. " href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/food-borne-illnesses-and-food-poisoning/">food poisoning</a>. It took my daughter a month to fully purge her infant system of the toxins and to return to her normal activity and developmental levels. I would like to know if I have a case against Disney. Are they liable for anything—medical bills, car rental, hotel bills or lost wages for me and my husband? Also, would she be eligible for any type of settlement, and if so, historically what might a fair settlement consist of? We live in New York, should we be looking for an attorney in New York or Orlando?<br />
-(Question submitted to Jonathan Gregg Stein, contributor at Avvo.com)</p>
<p><strong><em>A:</em></strong><em> Please keep in mind that I can only respond based on the information in your question, and my answer is not legal advice. With that being said, it sounds like you do have a case. The restaurant at <a title="Link to more information on Walt Disney World." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/disneys-mgm-studios/">Walt Disney World</a> is responsible for your medical bills as well as any general damages, including pain and suffering. You should look to retain an attorney in Orlando, particularly one who specializes in <a title="Link to more information on tourist injuries." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/tourist-injuries/">tourist injuries.</a> </em></p>
<p><strong>Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand, P.A.—<a title="Link to contact an Orlando personal injury attorney." href="http://www.whkpa.com/contact/">Orlando personal injury attorneys</a>. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/01/do-i-have-a-case-against-walt-disney-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tort Reform and Medical Malpractice in Florida</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/01/tort-reform-and-medical-malpractice-in-florida/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/01/tort-reform-and-medical-malpractice-in-florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando personal injury attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report issued on January 6, over 80% of errors committed by physicians in hospitals go unreported and undocumented. This should shock and alarm health administrators, legislators and the public in general. There is no excuse for not reporting these errors, no matter how trivial they may seem at the time. If the errors are not addressed, corrective measures cannot be taken to prevent <a title="Link to more information on medical malpractice." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/medical-malpractice/">medical malpractice</a> in the future, and potentially save lives.</p>
<p>“By identifying what’s happening to patients, that’ll prove a learning process,” said Deputy Inspector for the DHHS Ruth Ann Dorrill. Physicians need to be held accountable in order to protect the public.</p>
<p>Currently, there is no set number for punitive damages in Florida medical malpractice cases.</p>
<p>Potential tort reform may put a cap on the punitive damages that can be awarded in medical malpractice cases in Florida. There needs to be a financial incentive for physicians and hospitals to provide the best care possible. If there is no financial incentive to keep hospitals and their physicians on their toes, health care will become more and more reckless.</p>
<p>Have you or a loved one ever experienced or witnessed a medical error that went unreported?</p>
<p><strong>Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand, P.A.—<a title="Link to contact and Orlando personal injury attorney." href="http://www.whkpa.com/contact/">Orlando personal injury attorneys</a>. </strong></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report issued on January 6, over 80% of errors committed by physicians in hospitals go unreported and undocumented. This should shock and alarm health administrators, legislators and the public in general. There is no excuse for not reporting these errors, no matter how trivial they may seem at the time. If the errors are not addressed, corrective measures cannot be taken to prevent <a title="Link to more information on medical malpractice." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/medical-malpractice/">medical malpractice</a> in the future, and potentially save lives.</p>
<p>“By identifying what’s happening to patients, that’ll prove a learning process,” said Deputy Inspector for the DHHS Ruth Ann Dorrill. Physicians need to be held accountable in order to protect the public.</p>
<p>Currently, there is no set number for punitive damages in Florida medical malpractice cases.</p>
<p>Potential tort reform may put a cap on the punitive damages that can be awarded in medical malpractice cases in Florida. There needs to be a financial incentive for physicians and hospitals to provide the best care possible. If there is no financial incentive to keep hospitals and their physicians on their toes, health care will become more and more reckless.</p>
<p>Have you or a loved one ever experienced or witnessed a medical error that went unreported?</p>
<p><strong>Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand, P.A.—<a title="Link to contact and Orlando personal injury attorney." href="http://www.whkpa.com/contact/">Orlando personal injury attorneys</a>. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/01/tort-reform-and-medical-malpractice-in-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Man Dies From Airline Food Poisoning</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/12/florida-man-dies-from-airline-food-poisoning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/12/florida-man-dies-from-airline-food-poisoning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food-borne Illnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food poisoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando personal injury attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=1291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The family of a Florida man who died from <a title="Link to more information on food poisoning." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/food-borne-illnesses-and-food-poisoning/">food poisoning</a> from a meal he consumed on a flight has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against American Airlines, according to ABC News. Othon Cortes, 73, died after eating a chicken meal on a flight that was contaminated. His widow and daughter filed the suit.</p>
<p>American Airlines does not comment on pending litigation, according to a spokesman. Sky Chefs, an airline catering company, is also named in the lawsuit. Sky Chefs claims they did not cater meals on that particular flight. The lawsuit claims the chicken was contaminated with Clostridium perfingens, a deadly bacteria.</p>
<p>Once his flight landed in New York, Cortes had severe stomach pains and sudden thirst before boarding another flight to Miami. The flight had to make an emergency stop in Norfolf, Virginia as his conditioned worsened before he was pronounced dead.</p>
<p>Were you or a loved one injured by<a title="Link to more information on food poisoning." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/food-borne-illnesses-and-food-poisoning/"> food poisoning</a>?</p>
<p><strong>Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand, P.A.—<a title="Link to contact an Orlando personal injury attorney." href="http://www.whkpa.com/contact/">Orlando personal injury attorneys</a>. </strong></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The family of a Florida man who died from <a title="Link to more information on food poisoning." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/food-borne-illnesses-and-food-poisoning/">food poisoning</a> from a meal he consumed on a flight has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against American Airlines, according to ABC News. Othon Cortes, 73, died after eating a chicken meal on a flight that was contaminated. His widow and daughter filed the suit.</p>
<p>American Airlines does not comment on pending litigation, according to a spokesman. Sky Chefs, an airline catering company, is also named in the lawsuit. Sky Chefs claims they did not cater meals on that particular flight. The lawsuit claims the chicken was contaminated with Clostridium perfingens, a deadly bacteria.</p>
<p>Once his flight landed in New York, Cortes had severe stomach pains and sudden thirst before boarding another flight to Miami. The flight had to make an emergency stop in Norfolf, Virginia as his conditioned worsened before he was pronounced dead.</p>
<p>Were you or a loved one injured by<a title="Link to more information on food poisoning." href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/food-borne-illnesses-and-food-poisoning/"> food poisoning</a>?</p>
<p><strong>Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand, P.A.—<a title="Link to contact an Orlando personal injury attorney." href="http://www.whkpa.com/contact/">Orlando personal injury attorneys</a>. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/12/florida-man-dies-from-airline-food-poisoning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death Linked To King International’s ShoulderFlex Massager</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/09/death-linked-to-king-international%e2%80%99s-shoulderflex-massager/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/09/death-linked-to-king-international%e2%80%99s-shoulderflex-massager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[king international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neck massager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoulderflex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The FDA issued a recall on a neck massager after the death of Florida radiologist found strangled on Christmas Eve. The local police department confirmed that the device found next to Dr. Michelle-Ferrari-Gergerson’s body was King International’s ShoulderFlex Massager.</p>
<p>The Food and Drug Administration issued a warning about the ShoulderFlex last week, saying its rotating components were linked to the doctor’s death and one other near-strangulation. The device has rotating &#8220;ringers&#8221; inside a memory foam pillow, and was marketed as a do-it-yourself deep tissue massage. &#8220;It&#8217;s a very dangerous device and were glad they&#8217;re taking it off the market,&#8221; the victim’s husband, Dr. Kenneth Gegerson, said.</p>
<p>The police say the radiologist was alone wrapping gifts on Christmas Eve when she laid down to use the massager and her necklace apparently caught in its moving parts. The necklace quickly tightened, causing Ferrari-Gegerson to pass out and stop breathing. The FDA said other reported incidents said that hair caught in the ShoulderFlex massager. The FDA urged people who own the shoulder massager to &#8220;dispose of the device components separately so that the massager cannot be reassembled and used.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to the FDA, King International sold nearly 12,000 of the devices since 2003. The ShoulderFlex, which retailed for about $130, is no longer available for retail purchase.</p>
<p>Consult an <a title="Meet Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand Orlando personal injury attorneys" href="http://www.whkpa.com/aboutthefirm/our-attorneys/">Orlando injury attorney</a> if you or a loved one have been injured by a defective product.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDA issued a recall on a neck massager after the death of Florida radiologist found strangled on Christmas Eve. The local police department confirmed that the device found next to Dr. Michelle-Ferrari-Gergerson’s body was King International’s ShoulderFlex Massager.</p>
<p>The Food and Drug Administration issued a warning about the ShoulderFlex last week, saying its rotating components were linked to the doctor’s death and one other near-strangulation. The device has rotating &#8220;ringers&#8221; inside a memory foam pillow, and was marketed as a do-it-yourself deep tissue massage. &#8220;It&#8217;s a very dangerous device and were glad they&#8217;re taking it off the market,&#8221; the victim’s husband, Dr. Kenneth Gegerson, said.</p>
<p>The police say the radiologist was alone wrapping gifts on Christmas Eve when she laid down to use the massager and her necklace apparently caught in its moving parts. The necklace quickly tightened, causing Ferrari-Gegerson to pass out and stop breathing. The FDA said other reported incidents said that hair caught in the ShoulderFlex massager. The FDA urged people who own the shoulder massager to &#8220;dispose of the device components separately so that the massager cannot be reassembled and used.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to the FDA, King International sold nearly 12,000 of the devices since 2003. The ShoulderFlex, which retailed for about $130, is no longer available for retail purchase.</p>
<p>Consult an <a title="Meet Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand Orlando personal injury attorneys" href="http://www.whkpa.com/aboutthefirm/our-attorneys/">Orlando injury attorney</a> if you or a loved one have been injured by a defective product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/09/death-linked-to-king-international%e2%80%99s-shoulderflex-massager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chantix May Increase Your Risk of Heart Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/08/chantix-may-increase-your-risk-of-heart-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/08/chantix-may-increase-your-risk-of-heart-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beckie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando accident lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new study conducted by a Johns Hopkins researcher says that the popular anti-smoking drug Chantix may be responsible for increasing the risk of heart attacks and other serious heart problems in healthy, middle-aged smokers. Dr. Sonal Singh, the study’s lead author, is calling for the Food and Drug Administration to issue a stronger warning on the Chantix medication label.</p>
<p>Dr. Singh says that it is important for consumers to seek methods to help them quit smoking, and that most smokers wish to quit their bad habit in order to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, however, they may be taking a drug that increases the risk of the very problem they are trying to avoid. The study was released in the Canadian Medical Association Journal and says that the risk has increased by 72 percent for healthy, middle-aged smokers.</p>
<p>Singh reviewed 14 clinical trials and said the risk is significantly higher than the U.S. FDA indicated when it warned about a small increase in cardiovascular impacts for those using the drug Chantix. FSA officials responded by saying more analysis was necessary before the agency would move to change its position on Chantix safety. The FDA has also asked Pfizer to conduct a randomized study of possible psychiatric and cardiovascular risks associated with using Chantix.</p>
<p>An <a title="Link to information about the attorneys of Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand, P.A" href="http://www.whkpa.com/aboutthefirm/our-attorneys/">Orlando injury lawyer</a> can provide guidance if you have been injured due to using the anti-smoking drug Chantix or another <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/" title="Link to more information about Orlando defective product cases">defective product</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new study conducted by a Johns Hopkins researcher says that the popular anti-smoking drug Chantix may be responsible for increasing the risk of heart attacks and other serious heart problems in healthy, middle-aged smokers. Dr. Sonal Singh, the study’s lead author, is calling for the Food and Drug Administration to issue a stronger warning on the Chantix medication label.</p>
<p>Dr. Singh says that it is important for consumers to seek methods to help them quit smoking, and that most smokers wish to quit their bad habit in order to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, however, they may be taking a drug that increases the risk of the very problem they are trying to avoid. The study was released in the Canadian Medical Association Journal and says that the risk has increased by 72 percent for healthy, middle-aged smokers.</p>
<p>Singh reviewed 14 clinical trials and said the risk is significantly higher than the U.S. FDA indicated when it warned about a small increase in cardiovascular impacts for those using the drug Chantix. FSA officials responded by saying more analysis was necessary before the agency would move to change its position on Chantix safety. The FDA has also asked Pfizer to conduct a randomized study of possible psychiatric and cardiovascular risks associated with using Chantix.</p>
<p>An <a title="Link to information about the attorneys of Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand, P.A" href="http://www.whkpa.com/aboutthefirm/our-attorneys/">Orlando injury lawyer</a> can provide guidance if you have been injured due to using the anti-smoking drug Chantix or another <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/" title="Link to more information about Orlando defective product cases">defective product</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/08/chantix-may-increase-your-risk-of-heart-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Product Safety Commission Issues Pool Drain Cover Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/06/consumer-product-safety-commission-issues-pool-drain-cover-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/06/consumer-product-safety-commission-issues-pool-drain-cover-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beckie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to The Digital Journal, a recent pool drain cover recall has prompted public pool closures nationwide. The Consumer Product Safety Commission has recalled approximately 1 million pool and spa drain covers due to irregularly strong suction and related <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/" title="Link to information about Orlando personal injury lawyer">personal injury</a> risks from the defects. </p>
<p>A recent news report said that injury risk due to pool drain cover entrapment is especially high for young children. The CPSC has advised that kiddie pools, wading pools and in-ground spas should respond immediately to the safety recall and close public pool areas until the issue is resolved. The pool drain covers need to be replaced in order to prevent hazardous drain covers causing a needless tragedy. The CPSC Public Affairs director added that an incorrect certification process failed to uphold proper protocol during testing on pool drain covers and that the drain were improperly rated regarding water flow capacity. The CPSC has the authority to enforce public pool closures if necessary in order to maintain public safety standards.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whkpa.com/aboutthefirm/our-attorneys/" title="Meet Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand Orlando personal injury attorneys">Orlando personal injury attorney</a> advises that if you frequent a local pool or spa facility, talk to the administrators about the pool drain cover recall and ensure that the officials are taking proper steps to prevent risk and injury to patrons. As summer approaches, consumers look forward to cooling off in public pools and enjoying warm temperatures. However, safety should always be the number one priority.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to The Digital Journal, a recent pool drain cover recall has prompted public pool closures nationwide. The Consumer Product Safety Commission has recalled approximately 1 million pool and spa drain covers due to irregularly strong suction and related <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/" title="Link to information about Orlando personal injury lawyer">personal injury</a> risks from the defects. </p>
<p>A recent news report said that injury risk due to pool drain cover entrapment is especially high for young children. The CPSC has advised that kiddie pools, wading pools and in-ground spas should respond immediately to the safety recall and close public pool areas until the issue is resolved. The pool drain covers need to be replaced in order to prevent hazardous drain covers causing a needless tragedy. The CPSC Public Affairs director added that an incorrect certification process failed to uphold proper protocol during testing on pool drain covers and that the drain were improperly rated regarding water flow capacity. The CPSC has the authority to enforce public pool closures if necessary in order to maintain public safety standards.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whkpa.com/aboutthefirm/our-attorneys/" title="Meet Wooten, Kimbrough &amp; Normand Orlando personal injury attorneys">Orlando personal injury attorney</a> advises that if you frequent a local pool or spa facility, talk to the administrators about the pool drain cover recall and ensure that the officials are taking proper steps to prevent risk and injury to patrons. As summer approaches, consumers look forward to cooling off in public pools and enjoying warm temperatures. However, safety should always be the number one priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/06/consumer-product-safety-commission-issues-pool-drain-cover-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man Falls Off Defective Ladder, Sues Manufacturer and Retailer</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/man-falls-off-defective-ladder-sues-manufacturer-and-retailer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/man-falls-off-defective-ladder-sues-manufacturer-and-retailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 09:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beckie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando accident lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to The Madison St. Clair Record, a Montgomery County man is suing Louisville Ladder and R.P. Lumber after he says he fell off the ladder and fractured both ankles. William and Celene Harrelson filed a lawsuit April 15 in Madison County Circuit Court against the two companies.</p>
<p>Harrelson says he had worked at the U.S. Minerals plant and used an extension ladder manufactured by Louisville Ladder when the fall occurred. The side rails of the upper section of the ladder failed, causing Harrelson to fall approximately 15 feet, fracturing both of his ankles. Harrelson developed arthritis in his ankles and incurred medical costs due to the fall, as well as lost wages and emotional pain, suffering, mental distress and disability.</p>
<p>The Harrelsons blame Louisville Ladder for a <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">defective product</a> that caused his fall, saying it negligently improperly constructed the ladder, and manufactured the <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">defective product</a> using materials that did not meet design specifications and improperly designed the latter. R.P. Lumber is named as a defendant in the suit because they sold the ladder even though it had a damaged side rail and missing bolts and screws, says the complaint. The couple, with the help of their <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">personal injury lawyer</a>, seek a judgment of more than $400,000, plus costs and other relief the court deems just.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to The Madison St. Clair Record, a Montgomery County man is suing Louisville Ladder and R.P. Lumber after he says he fell off the ladder and fractured both ankles. William and Celene Harrelson filed a lawsuit April 15 in Madison County Circuit Court against the two companies.</p>
<p>Harrelson says he had worked at the U.S. Minerals plant and used an extension ladder manufactured by Louisville Ladder when the fall occurred. The side rails of the upper section of the ladder failed, causing Harrelson to fall approximately 15 feet, fracturing both of his ankles. Harrelson developed arthritis in his ankles and incurred medical costs due to the fall, as well as lost wages and emotional pain, suffering, mental distress and disability.</p>
<p>The Harrelsons blame Louisville Ladder for a <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">defective product</a> that caused his fall, saying it negligently improperly constructed the ladder, and manufactured the <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">defective product</a> using materials that did not meet design specifications and improperly designed the latter. R.P. Lumber is named as a defendant in the suit because they sold the ladder even though it had a damaged side rail and missing bolts and screws, says the complaint. The couple, with the help of their <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">personal injury lawyer</a>, seek a judgment of more than $400,000, plus costs and other relief the court deems just.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/man-falls-off-defective-ladder-sues-manufacturer-and-retailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wheelchair Bound Man Falls, Sues City for Defective Ramp</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/wheelchair-bound-man-falls-sues-city-for-defective-ramp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/wheelchair-bound-man-falls-sues-city-for-defective-ramp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 09:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beckie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando accident lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orlando injury lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the Sheboygan Press, a personal injury lawsuit against the City of Sheboygan is going to trial next week. A jury will decide whether to hold the city liable for injuries suffered when a man’s wheelchair tipped on a ramp between the street and sidewalk. Ronald Behr, with the help of his <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">personal injury lawyer</a>, filed suit in March 2010, seeking compensation for a 2009 incident alleging he had suffered severe and permanent injuries from the fall. The complaint did not specify the nature of his injuries.</p>
<p>The trial is expected to last two days before Judge Angela Sutkiewicz. Behr said that he was on a ramp from the sidewalk to the street when a piece of patched asphalt broke loose, causing his wheelchair to dig in the pavement, pitch forward and throw him to the ground. Behr alleges the city was careless and negligent in repairing the <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">defective product</a>, and that the city was aware of the danger of the carelessly patched asphalt. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages as determined at trial and reimbursement of personal <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">injury lawyer</a> fees.</p>
<p>The city has denied negligence and says it received no notice of a defect in the wheelchair tamp. Behr filed the suit after the Common Council refused his initial claim for damages. By voting unanimously, the board agreed to deny the claim, and allege that Behr also suffered a similar fall at a different intersection.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Sheboygan Press, a personal injury lawsuit against the City of Sheboygan is going to trial next week. A jury will decide whether to hold the city liable for injuries suffered when a man’s wheelchair tipped on a ramp between the street and sidewalk. Ronald Behr, with the help of his <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">personal injury lawyer</a>, filed suit in March 2010, seeking compensation for a 2009 incident alleging he had suffered severe and permanent injuries from the fall. The complaint did not specify the nature of his injuries.</p>
<p>The trial is expected to last two days before Judge Angela Sutkiewicz. Behr said that he was on a ramp from the sidewalk to the street when a piece of patched asphalt broke loose, causing his wheelchair to dig in the pavement, pitch forward and throw him to the ground. Behr alleges the city was careless and negligent in repairing the <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">defective product</a>, and that the city was aware of the danger of the carelessly patched asphalt. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages as determined at trial and reimbursement of personal <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">injury lawyer</a> fees.</p>
<p>The city has denied negligence and says it received no notice of a defect in the wheelchair tamp. Behr filed the suit after the Common Council refused his initial claim for damages. By voting unanimously, the board agreed to deny the claim, and allege that Behr also suffered a similar fall at a different intersection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/wheelchair-bound-man-falls-sues-city-for-defective-ramp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woman Sues for Injuries Sustained In Dallas Cowboys Facility Collapse</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/woman-sues-for-injuries-sustained-in-dallas-cowboys-facility-collapse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/woman-sues-for-injuries-sustained-in-dallas-cowboys-facility-collapse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beckie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Avvo, a Texas woman who works for the Dallas Cowboys has filed a personal injury lawsuit over the 2009 collapse of one of the team’s practice facilities. In May of 2009, the Cowboys special teams coach Joe DeCamilis broke his back and 11 other employees were injured when winds ripped through the roof of the team’s indoor practice area during a rookie minicamp. Of the twelve individuals hospitalized, ten were taken by emergency vehicles and one went on their own.</p>
<p>The 88,000-square-foot building collapsed during the wind storm and Jancy Briles, who works in the team’s public relations department, claims that she suffered injuries. The plaintiffs injury attorney did not specify the nature of injuries she suffered and did not disclose them in the filing.</p>
<p>The plaintiff’s <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">injury lawyer</a> did not name the Cowboys in the suit. Instead, Briles identified Summit Structures LLC of Pennsylvania and the parent company Cover-All Building Systems Inc. of Canada as defendants for an accident that may have resulted from a <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">defective product</a>. </p>
<p>Coach Joe DeCamilis endured broke vertebrae and scout Rich Behm was paralyzed from the waste down as a result of the incident. The individuals received personal injury settlements totaling $35 million, according to the Associated Press. Jamar Hunt, the Cowboys tight end, suffered a herniated disk as a result of the roof collapse.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Avvo, a Texas woman who works for the Dallas Cowboys has filed a personal injury lawsuit over the 2009 collapse of one of the team’s practice facilities. In May of 2009, the Cowboys special teams coach Joe DeCamilis broke his back and 11 other employees were injured when winds ripped through the roof of the team’s indoor practice area during a rookie minicamp. Of the twelve individuals hospitalized, ten were taken by emergency vehicles and one went on their own.</p>
<p>The 88,000-square-foot building collapsed during the wind storm and Jancy Briles, who works in the team’s public relations department, claims that she suffered injuries. The plaintiffs injury attorney did not specify the nature of injuries she suffered and did not disclose them in the filing.</p>
<p>The plaintiff’s <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">injury lawyer</a> did not name the Cowboys in the suit. Instead, Briles identified Summit Structures LLC of Pennsylvania and the parent company Cover-All Building Systems Inc. of Canada as defendants for an accident that may have resulted from a <a href="http://www.whkpa.com/practiceareas/defective-products-liability/">defective product</a>. </p>
<p>Coach Joe DeCamilis endured broke vertebrae and scout Rich Behm was paralyzed from the waste down as a result of the incident. The individuals received personal injury settlements totaling $35 million, according to the Associated Press. Jamar Hunt, the Cowboys tight end, suffered a herniated disk as a result of the roof collapse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/woman-sues-for-injuries-sustained-in-dallas-cowboys-facility-collapse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fosamax Manufacturers Sued for Drug&#8217;s Over Promotion of Off-Label Uses</title>
		<link>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/fosamax-manufacturers-sued-for-drugs-over-promotion-of-off-label-uses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/fosamax-manufacturers-sued-for-drugs-over-promotion-of-off-label-uses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 11:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beckie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[femur fracture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fosamax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-label use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteoporosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the Louisiana Record, a Lafourche Parish woman has filed a personal injury lawsuit against the manufacturers of the drug Fosamax regarding over-promotion for alleged off-label uses. Off-label is a term used for medications that are used for non-approved use. </p>
<p>Josephine Naccio filed a lawsuit against Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp aka Merck, Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc and Barr Laboratories Inc in federal court in New Orleans.</p>
<p>Naccio claims she was prescribes Fosamax by a doctor for long-term use for the treatment of osteoporosis. As a result of use, she suffered an unexplained femur fracture. Naccio claims she would not have taken the drug has she known of the risks associated with long-term use.</p>
<p>Fosamax or Alendronate is used to prevent osteoporosis, a condition in which the bones become thin and weak, and break easily in women who have undergone menopause. Osteoporosis can also occur in men. Fosamax is used to treat men and women who are taking corticosteroids, a type of medication that is known to cause osteoporosis. </p>
<p>Fosamax has several side effects such as nausea and stomach pains. However, it is also associated with an increased risk of breaking a thigh bone. Patients taking the drug may experience pain in hips, groin or thighs weeks or months before the bones break even without any falls or trauma.</p>
<p>The plaintiff is accusing the companies of concealing the dangerous risks of femur fractures and failing to conduct post-marketing surveillance of the drug’s effects. The plaintiff’s causes of action against the defendant include composition defect, design defect, inadequate warning, breach of express warranty, redhibition and breach of express and implied warranty of fitness for ordinary use.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Louisiana Record, a Lafourche Parish woman has filed a personal injury lawsuit against the manufacturers of the drug Fosamax regarding over-promotion for alleged off-label uses. Off-label is a term used for medications that are used for non-approved use. </p>
<p>Josephine Naccio filed a lawsuit against Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp aka Merck, Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc and Barr Laboratories Inc in federal court in New Orleans.</p>
<p>Naccio claims she was prescribes Fosamax by a doctor for long-term use for the treatment of osteoporosis. As a result of use, she suffered an unexplained femur fracture. Naccio claims she would not have taken the drug has she known of the risks associated with long-term use.</p>
<p>Fosamax or Alendronate is used to prevent osteoporosis, a condition in which the bones become thin and weak, and break easily in women who have undergone menopause. Osteoporosis can also occur in men. Fosamax is used to treat men and women who are taking corticosteroids, a type of medication that is known to cause osteoporosis. </p>
<p>Fosamax has several side effects such as nausea and stomach pains. However, it is also associated with an increased risk of breaking a thigh bone. Patients taking the drug may experience pain in hips, groin or thighs weeks or months before the bones break even without any falls or trauma.</p>
<p>The plaintiff is accusing the companies of concealing the dangerous risks of femur fractures and failing to conduct post-marketing surveillance of the drug’s effects. The plaintiff’s causes of action against the defendant include composition defect, design defect, inadequate warning, breach of express warranty, redhibition and breach of express and implied warranty of fitness for ordinary use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.orlandopersonalinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/fosamax-manufacturers-sued-for-drugs-over-promotion-of-off-label-uses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

